
-When you plan the realization of a film project, what are your objectives?
When I plan a film project, my objectives are clear: to build a narrative that holds on screen, to structure a viable production model, and to ensure the film reaches the audience in its full form.
The starting point is always conflict. It is what organizes character, action, and language. From there, I approach the film both as an artistic work and as a product. I aim for a narrative with a strong identity, but also with the capacity to circulate in festivals, theaters, and streaming platforms. Planning must balance dramatic strength with real production feasibility.
I seek to develop projects with solid dramatic consistency, a defined language, and a clear market positioning. This guides every decision, from script to direction, from budget to distribution strategy.
I work with my feet on the ground, within the possibilities of independent cinema, without giving up aesthetic ambition. Creativity is the axis that sustains this equation, allowing the project to achieve quality and compete in the international circuit.
– With Artificial Intelligence, cinema is undergoing a phase of transformation even more radical than the one that occurred in the 1920s with the transition from silent films to sound. What is your opinion on this?
Artificial Intelligence is just another tool. The creative process remains human. Creation requires decision, and decision is human.
Cinema comes from experience, conflict, and intuition, elements that cannot be automated. Artificial Intelligence can support technical stages and research processes, but it does not replace the eye, the decision, and the responsibility of the creator.
The transition from silent to sound cinema transformed language. AI impacts the process. These are different natures.
The risk is not in the technology, but in how it is used. The tool cannot dictate content. If that happens, cinema loses its identity. AI expands possibilities, but it must function as support. Authorship and creativity remain human.
– To which production or distribution company would you like to propose your new project? Give us a profile, including some examples.
I am looking for partners with international reach, capable of connecting my films to different territories and platforms, without losing the project’s identity. My interest is in production and distribution companies working in independent cinema, with presence in festivals and experience in international sales, both for theaters release and streaming licensing, with a real capacity to bring the film to the audience. Partners who follow the project, understand its positioning in the market, and sustain its trajectory after completion.
Projects like Doctor Hypotheses 2 call for this kind of partnership, with an international vision and practical experience in film circulation, capable of articulating co-productions, accessing funds, and building a consistent trajectory across festivals, theaters, and platforms.
– WILD FILMMAKER can now “sit at the table with the big players” alongside The Hollywood Reporter and Variety during the Cannes Film Festival, but we have chosen to continue being a Global Cultural
Movement with an ethical mission: to bring democracy into cinema, placing the Work of Art at the center of our project rather than Marketing.
The proposal is relevant. Placing the work at the center is essential. But this needs to have the magic word of cinema: action. It cannot be just discourse. It has to be practice and sustain this position within a market driven by marketing. If you can maintain this commitment over time, you are on the right path, and we will be applauding.
– Do you think we are doing a good job?
The path is interesting. The fact that you open space for the film and for the independent filmmaker is a major differentiator, especially for those working outside the center of the major industrial market. But the result is measured in practice, in the way projects are presented, followed, and positioned in the market. If this commitment is maintained, then yes, it is an exceptional work.
