I’m a novice director, who also happens to be a disabled mom and grandmother. After various careers as a restaurateur, social activist, high school teacher, and visual artist, I felt compelled to make my documentary film at 66 years of age when I researched the history of my great Aunt Pasqualina.
-What inspired you to become a filmmaker?
I needed to tell the true story of my Italian immigrant family following a familiar path to pursuing the American Dream. In Pasqualina of Springfield, the mafia anti-hero is a powerful, complex woman. The gangster movie genre has not been about female central characters. Pasqualina of Springfield couldn’t be timelier.
-Do you think the cinema can bring a change in society?
Cinema has contributed to many societal shifts for more than a hundred years continues to influence culture in sometimes positive, other times negative ways. Cinema is one of the most influential and powerful art forms. Movies have shaped the world we live in, and their power can’t be ignored.
-What would you change in the world?
My list is too long for this interview, but to start; I’d like to stop the injustices caused by racism. I’d raise awareness of the fact that North Americans occupy and continue to destroy land stolen from Native Americans. I’d change the situation where I live in Los Angeles. The United Nations has declared certain areas humanitarian crisis zones because as many as 70,000 unhoused people exist on the streets in this wealthy city in absolute squalor. Far-right nationalism grows around us. War, out-of-control capitalism, and all the destruction it brings, I wish I could change these problems and more.
-Where do you see the film industry going in the next 100 years?
Ha-ha! I really do not know where the film industry will be in the next 100 years. When I was growing up, I was clueless. I didn’t know we would have streaming, digital images, online platforms, etc. I’m not super high-tech. So, I can’t imagine what experiences the future will bring, but I know human beings are natural communicators. There’s cave art 40 thousand years old telling stories. So, I assume we will always be storytellers.
I am an ordinary man who makes an ordinary life. I have a family that I love.
The difference is that I live for the cinema and its representations. So I live “normally” but in my human and artistic dimension that has generated over the years, within me, a kind of clear “mission” in my life: telling stories that can touch the hearts of others.
-What inspired you to become a filmmaker?
At the age of 14 after school I worked as an assistant to a photographer. I learned the technique of images, but at the same time, I felt something inside of me, an attraction to the world seen through the lens of a camera It takes me into a different world where I fully recognise myself.
I recognise in myself the world I see through a camera. As if for me that “reality” (seen through the camera) represented the true nature of things and the world.
-Do you think the cinema can bring a change in the society?
YES! It absolutely can contribute to a change of thoughts and culture. As well as all art in general. Cinema tells stories. Our life is made of stories. And the history of the world is made of stories. What is different is how one sees and perceives these stories. It is not enough to relate to the stories around us with a passive attitude. To change our personal condition as human beings, stories should be an opportunity to change ourselves, along with others. The problem is that today there is not this kind of artistic and creative ferment. The Nouvelle Vague represented a revolution in the thoughts and ways in which stories were told. The difference, therefore, in the end, is deciding whether to remain conservative or to be dreamers, people who want to change the world. Throughout the history of the twentieth century, ideology and utopia have contributed to an improvement of human beings from a reversal point of view, revolutions of certain systems, as well as a radical change in emotional relationships. Today we are experiencing a period of global uncertainty and human beings need to regain confidence in themselves and their potential. I am absolutely convinced that cinema helps to find oneself.
-What would you change in the world?
Ignorance begets monsters. So does greed and lust for power. Capitalism has generated an illusory lifestyle in which consumption and lifestyle push us to consume useless things. I believe that the “evil” of the world comes mainly from the imperialist mentality that certain nations still have. Especially America thanks to the support of Hollywood propaganda has always tried to find the evil enemies in their stories: in the 60s’ enemies were the Native Americans, then the Vietnamese, Cambodians, the Russians during the cold war, Cubans, Arabs, Palestinians, Iranians, and finally Chinese. I would like to say that this imperialist propaganda system, even in cinema, has generated only a distortion of history which, in turn, has produced a prejudice and a judgment on different ones, on those who feel different or outside this logic.
–Where do you see the film industry going in the next 100 years?
I believe in the positive potential of human beings and therefore in the future I see a return to the simplicity of life. Now we see everything, especially in the entertainment industry, where stories are built in dystopian worlds, sometimes terrible and catastrophic worlds, where humanity often has no hope or has to fight with “higher forces”. There is an overabundance of visual information, a visionary overdose that also extends in the social network, in which even ignorant people feel the protagonists of nothing. There are many Apps that make you more beautiful (but still not smarter) and Apps that generate VFX that we can use in our personal lives. All this “quest for nothingness” I hope will lead humanity to a collective awakening that could dust off the simple stories that reach everyone’s heart.
Rachel Dolan is a Latina theatre artist, actor, writer, and filmmaker. Her love of theatre and film was sparked at an early age, a passion she knew she could not live without. As a theatre artist in her local community, she focuses on social justice themes, contributing to shows which focus heavily on the voices of those that are unheard or historically ignored. Rachel gained her Bachelor of Arts in Theatre from Temple University in Philadelphia and most recently acquired her Master of Fine Arts in Performing Arts from the Savannah College of Art & Design. As an actor and theatre artist, Rachel has an additional curiosity in all roles in theatre and film, spending time as a theatre apprentice, and eventually creating her own short film during her graduate program at SCAD. Creating her short film, El Canto de los Coquis quickly became an opportunity for further exploration of creativity, craft, and a love letter for Puerto Rico as seen through the eyes of a Puerto Rican-American woman. Rachel’s love for creating live beings through acting, reflecting the reality individuals must endure as well as welcoming space for new perspectives and voices was expounded upon through the creation of her film. She has a passion for art, empathy, creativity, collaboration, education, and the drive to contribute to the world in a positive way.
–What inspired you to become a filmmaker? I absolutely love to write. Writing gives me a sense of peace, an opportunity to process life into a world of creativity, one in which there is freedom to be our whole selves. Because of my love of writing, I would often create my own plays, as an actor, my own monologues and scenes, and my own scripts. The process is exhilarating, in a similar way acting is. One is bearing their soul, feelings, and emotions for others in hopes that they, too, feel truly seen in a world where we feel we must hide who we are for safety, from the pressure of others, or sometimes out of our own fear. The stories that come alive through writing then have the opportunity to be shared with others, to be felt by an audience, and exist to promote discussion or education, empathy or understanding. One of the most important reasons why I became an artist and filmmaker is for others to feel seen, heard, and to feel less alone. Witnessing a character living through a struggle in their life or something they cannot see their way out of and eventually overcoming it, becomes transformative for an audience because we can all identify with the human condition and a journey in which we are constantly discovering what we need and who we are. We all have a place in this world, and not only should we share our own unique perspectives and who we are, but we should also encourage others to do the same. I created my short film partly because I felt like there was no space for me, struggling with the complexity and experience of being a Latina and American, but also to communicate that those who might feel the same way are not alone and that it should be encouraged to accept all that we are. The other importance for me was that I know what it is to struggle and to come from a community that does not have the support that they should, but in that place still lives joy and love and opportunity. If I can dream and create and continue to rise above obstacles, then I would love to inspire those who also experience barriers to overcome them.
-Do you think the cinema can bring a change in the society?
I absolutely believe that any form of art, film, theatre, and more can become a catalyst for change. We have the unique opportunity as artists to impact individuals in ways that others may not. Artists work in the language of souls, being and living, in that which cannot be seen but that is felt. Cinema has the opportunity to welcome conversations, change viewpoints and bring people closer. Cinema is often categorized as entertainment, but it also has the capacity to educate. We find ourselves more open to storytelling or experiencing another journey through art, whereas we may not be so inclined in other facets of life. Many may argue that film is based in fiction, although art mimics life, even art that may not be so overtly grounded in what we view is normal reality. Cinema compels us to consider what is beyond our everyday, even when we are presented with what may be viewed as daily life. Stories are slowed down and viewed on a larger scale, moment to moment is witnessed which is often glazed over in daily life. In cinema, moments are not passed, they are savored, and display life being lived, considered, and felt. I often argue that fact and statistics, although useful, are cold and unapproachable to many people. Numbers are distant, they can be brushed aside. However, when one is faced with an individual who may be included in the statistics discussed, they are humanized. They become someone who reminds us of our mother or friend, or even ourselves. Change is brought about through feeling and responding, something cinema will not allow audiences to turn away from. Throughout history, cinema based in documentaries, narratives, and any type of work has inspired change whether unearthing truth which has been kept in the dark or asking us to face that which has remained hidden within ourselves, and it will continue to do so as time moves on. Cinema inspires, challenges, illuminates, and welcomes individuals to be transformed and in my opinion, that is the best kind of art there is.
What would you change in the world?
Incredibly, there is an innumerable amount that people have discovered or achieved, but there also is so much more we are unaware of or have gotten very wrong. So many lives are being uprooted by countless issues in our world and of course everyone should be working to better these occurrences. As individuals, we can only help to better things where we can, making differences in the ways we are able to. Together, we have the capacity to better living situations on a larger scale and work to ensure that people’s basic rights and needs are met. Of course, I would love to see a world where people do not suffer, although it is not the one we live in. However, we can still try to alleviate that suffering when we are met with it, on whatever scale that may be. People wish to be seen, heard, understood, loved, included, and valued. In my own life and work I attempt to meet those needs and feel that if we can individually meet people with kindness, we can make steps towards positive change. I would also love to see the arts valued for how they impact people and the world. Funding, education, and excitement about the arts should be promoted, not stripped away. Not only because art can promote joy or assist in processing issues in our own lives, but because it fosters empathy which the world needs more of. If we can better learn to understand, listen, and close the divide between peoples, we may have a better chance of creating change that is rooted in action.
-Where do you see the film industry going in the next 100 years?
I think the film industry has its problems like any, but it continues to move in the direction people are calling for. It pushes society forward, even when society may not want to follow it, but it is what is needed. Artists and filmmakers can often be the most open minded, and inclusive group of people because we are asked to analyze life, to listen to what is around us and to invite conversation and collaboration. We are a group that considers the disciplines of history, technology, anthropology, psychology and more into an art form that asks us to face what we must and look towards where we wish to go. I hope, and I believe the industry will continue to become more inclusive to all individuals, especially those that fall outside of the normative societal view. Technology and equipment may become even more detailed in extracting true essences of life and I also believe performances will move in the same vein. Art movements follow life and world events, and cinema will continue to experience groundbreaking changes as will people and the world. I do have hope that all things will move towards a better future and that cinema will remain thriving and celebrated and will not only capture these changes but drive them forward.
An artist, an actor, a writer/director, producer and lover of horses and history especially hidden history. I grew up in the Deep South – New Orleans, Louisiana and Birmingham, Alabama. I received an art scholarship to Pratt Institute and moved to Brooklyn, New York where I later focused on Theater as an actor then a writer and began exploring film as an artistic and storytelling medium.
–What inspired you to become a filmmaker?
As an art student at Pratt I would venture to New York City and see amazing art and amazing independent and avant garde films. Movies are moving paintings. Filmmakers I love are Jane Campion, David Lynch, Terrence Malick, Peter Weir. Frequenting the now defunct Kim’s Video in the East Village gave me a once in a lifetime glimpse into the obscure filmmaking of the world!
-Do you think cinema can bring a change in society?
I do. When truth is uncovered and revealed through storytelling I believe audiences and viewers are receptive.
-What would you change in the world?
I would change how the earth’s resources are consumed. I would want conservation and climate change issues to be top of the list in any endeavor be it political, philosophical and/or philanthropic . We are all called to be stewards of this beautiful life-giving blue planet.
-Where do you see the film industry going in the next 100 years?
Hopefully towards equality in all respects. Storytelling is as old as humanity and reflects the cultures of the time. As technology grows so will the way we make and view cinema. Perhaps immersive physical experiences within a film or story are not that far away into the future. Archetypes will always stand true but who tells the story, from whose gaze we experience the characters and from whose perspective the story is told will be important factors in the evolution of the art.
I am a victor over a traumatic childhood, domestic violence, and overcoming challenges knowing I was gay while growing up in the South. I am a persistent and strong woman because of my past, ultimately leading me on a discovery of self after retiring from 20 years of massage therapy. I did give up on myself a few times and chose to rebirth. Life is about the journey and not the destination. I love telling hard stories, showcasing the underestimated or underdog perspectives, while being built on a foundation of healing intended to inspire others for empowered change. I am an advocate for equity, equality, and worldwide healing so desperately needed…rooted in my spiritual practice while being fueled by my determination…and coffee.
-What inspired me to become a filmmaker?
Returning to college at 48 years young and discovering buried childhood dreams of being a Director inspired me to become a filmmaker. I had a teacher that became a mentor, believed in me, and invested in my dreams. David-Matthew Barnes was instrumental in inspiring me to have faith in myself and leap forward. He is a true gift to the world! His short play “Baby in the Basement” became my directorial debut and it has accumulated 18 awards in the indie film festivals. I am eternally grateful for David-Matthew’s unwavering belief in me!
-Do you think the cinema can bring a change to society?
Given the changes we are seeing now, I believe cinema will bring greater change in society. Filmmaking provides access to new ways of being, challenges programmed thinking, and expands our minds for growth. You simply have to be open to watching the screen and embrace a willingness to be the change. Change is inevitable and provides a smoother process when you surrender attachments to expectations associated with control or fear. Art is vital to creative expression with cinema easily being the greatest access point influencing societal change.
–What would you change in the world?
Gosh, where do I begin? I would start with free worldwide mental health assistance since the pandemic changed everything. Therapy and coaching available to everyone created to empower people to thrive, rooted in equity and equal rights. A humanity driven system built with love of the people, NOT race, encourages unique individual purposes, and collectively choosing to dismantle old programming. Women’s rights are only decided by women for women by those living and identifying as a woman. Gun protocols with increased safety measures. Leaders for the people and not an agenda. Better solutions everywhere!
–Where do you see the film industry going in the next 100 years?
Creatives have more control over their content, freedom, self-expression, and expansion while moving about in new ways because visionaries build new worlds. I believe we will see a vast increase in independent filmmakers and studios, calling their own shots, and improved space for creating content. I feel we will see an increase in original content and a rise in female filmmakers as the entertainment industry continues with much-needed shifts. At least that is what I envision.
A Palestinian artist and first professional actress in my village
Holds a Bachelor Degrees (B.A) in Acting & Directing University of Haifa.
Actress, Theatre Director, Filmmaker and The Co-Founder and Manger of “kawaliss” The House of Theatre and Cinema.
At Theater as an actress participated in several international tours in Des Quartiers D’Ivry theater /France, National theater of London, participated in the Carthage Festival -Tunisia.
By the first African Nobel prize winner “Wole Soyinka” I performed tow of his known plays at “the National theater of Nigeria”.
“Ebdon university” and “The National theater of Sweden”.
” Choices” A monodrama as a writer and performer received an award of ” Masraheed Festival” “The best creative actress of 2013 “.
Directed several theater productions as “Blood weeding”, ” “Macbeth”, “Fate of a Cockroach”, “The Executioner and the convicted to Execution”, ” Les Misérables”.
As Filmmaker and actress Short Films as a one-minute short film “Woman and Man”
,”Frame”, “Guys Talk”, and lastly “Cigarette”.
-What inspired you to become a filmmaker?
I love movies and acting since my childhood, I get distracted by
the movement of people, their bodies, their rhythm, their looks, their strangeness, and their passion, Suddenly, I got an idea, and started calling my “kawaliss” band, The band and I have been together for twelve years I taught them acting since they were young and they gave me life and there was a reason why I wake up in the morning and why do I even love art, after touring In Paris as an actress I become a Struggled mother of twin boys with an autism diagnosis, suffering from postpartum depression seeing movies was my last breath
I met a photographer who became my mentor eventually he saw this in me before I did, he forced me to held his camera it was heavy and confusing and nothing that I know and I just found myself again after The question was if I can overcome my dilemma between my true love of my boys and my soul that was lost battling every day’s responsibilities, In the darkest moments when I thought of giving up, I did my first short movie in a smartphone about my struggle as a woman I challenged myself to put an end of all of this in just one minuet short film and somehow this gave me peace and my adventure of filmmaking just began, “kawaliss “Is my grandfather house old library I took this abounded place and mad it a house of theater and cinema, in our home “kwaliss” we talk about pain and mad movies about it we become one family, I took a big loan from the bank with the support of the group I produced “Cigarette” as a professional big budget movie
We turned the house into a place where the normal rooms were filmed and turned into a store for masks, clothes and decorations
From here, from the occupied land of Palestine, there is a group called “Kawaliss”
The harsh conditions of the Palestinian people including those who remained on their land in addition to being deprived their basic rights and most importantly of the right of expression and keeping their national identity, have motivated us to express ourselves through art in general and filmmaking in particular, out of our belief that it is a powerful means which can be used to influence people and change their reality.
We learn from history that nations who had a great culture had taken a great interest in theatre and cinema and developed it so that it became an integral part of that culture. Considering this fact, why should we accept our weakness and disability?
Why shouldn’t we try and make a difference by using the magic powers of cinema?
My reaction was the initiative to establish “kawaliss”, which I believe will be addressing the Palestinian people and appealing to their suffering and anger but also to their joy and love of life.
My movie “Cigarette” was inspired from a conversation with a journalist that was telling his beautiful experience and great achievement when he was assigned to cover news before anyone else, he was the first to arrive to the scene (man killed his brother). Hearing the journalist describing how happy he was to cover the incident and to be the first to see the knife and smell the blood at the same time in my life that I am learning film making, so I wrote my film about what happened, and I became me myself inside the documentary film of this “photographer”
What I gathered from characters were all based on real and documented stories of struggles from the actors themselves.
The actors searched inside of them for their true feelings and personal stories. In one house I gathered these characters as the writer and director, to look for the personal relations people have between them, and their selves differentiated by their struggles, problems, and points of view; All to be captured by the lens of one of the character’s own cameras.
-Do you think the cinema can bring a change in the society?
in centuries two last the for tool ancient and powerful a is Cinema on focusing and world the to reality of image the conveyingissues. people’s
Today’s the presenting by and transmission real this Through,solution alternative the for proposal a presents cinema the issues,
of establishment the for calls also it humanity, of meaning the is Itharmony peace, in lives that society, human and civilized a
beauty. and
and imagination develop to advances youth creative cinema, Inneed. and want we change the ideas, progressive and new
and weak the of voices the make to tool a be should Cinema and reality terbit the monitoring for tool a heard, be to oppressed difficult especially people, with happening is what documentingtaboos. breaks or about talk to dares one no that cases
Through the cinema, the director sheds light on daily problems, and through the aesthetics of filming across locations and the harmony of colors, and the depth of acting we can change the thinking of an entire society.
-What would you change in the world?
Death, and what is worse than death? Death while you are alive, death of hope, death of any attempt to change.
Carelessness and human loss of identity and role in life, uninterested in being affected and affecting, and the question that inspired my film:
r fated to do so?”.“The human, is he given the choice? O
Nonetheless of the fear, corruption, and exploits, is life worth living for those who feel like misfits? Those who no longer feel the urge to wake up, is the system’s weed getting us high? Controlling us? e?gamare we in charge of the big
When watching the film “cigarette”, I intended for the viewer to experience the movie from a perspective other than that of the killer or the victim; good and evil; black and white.
There is a different viewpoint which is you the viewers. Ever since eternity, the worst kind of violence and murder, bloody wars between brothers and enemies, the jealousy of Cain towards Abel, the absurdity of the black and white fight made Eteocles killhis younger brother Polynices in the tragedy of “Antigone”, and Romulus who killed his twin brother Remus to build modern Rome. We are still here on this earth ever since birth, going through chapters, entering doors while the earth spins and the roles Between all the events , ange, and the place remains the samechoccurring to us, opinions oppose whether the collision between poor living circumstances and the political circumstances is a product of the new machinery age, in an attempt to lay a new
ion for the new modern human.explanat I see murder as killing all of humanity, you do not have to be my brother, from my mother or father, for me to see you for who you really are and accept your differences, see your suffering and ion between humans is what struggle. The lack of communicatcauses misunderstanding and gets us to even hate each other, without really seeing what the other is going through.
are we as the viewers and the people watching are numb (high) with no ability whatsoever of confrontation? daily what happens when someone tries to kill another; we seeshould I get involved? Shakespeare once said “All the world’s a stage…” and I add that life is just merely a film that we live its shots to the fateful end.
n our minds that movies I would change in this world the question iof course will take this role of great thinking and simply
“Humans, do have “the choice” to care.
And they are fated to help each other, this our pure nature”.
-Where do you see the film industry going in the next 100 years?
From a long time, films focus on the directors’ inspiration for each other, One of aspects of watching a film is tracing certain directorial roots, Certain shots, scenes, or bits of dialogue, which renews the cycle for the next generation.
I believe of the influence a masterful director can be.
In the theatre we are still influenced by the works of Shakespeare and the impact of the Spanish “Garcia Lorca”, The importance of the Japanese Noh Theatre, we will always return to the most ancient civilization of “Greek and Roman Theater” and mythologies as a great source of art and philosophy.
Many contemporary writers came after them as “Oscar Wilde”, “Arthur Miller”, “Samuel Barclay Beckett”… etc.
In cinema, it is the same When “David Lynch” was affected by the , and in turn,Andrei Tarkovsky”work of the great director “
himself was affected by the great director Tarkovsky” “
Mohammed Even the Arab Egyptian director ” “Ingmar Bergman”,’s work, nor do we see the influence of khan ” We cannot seekhanThe Depth of “Michelangelo Antonioni” or the Italian directorYasujirō Ozu” frame.of ” Simplicity
Most Yong directors and the entire film industry completely “Stanley Kubrick”,” changed after “Orson Welles”, “Sidney Lumet”,Akira Kurosawa”, “John Ford”…etc. Alfred Hitchcock”,”
And in the next generation, came,” Martin Scorsese”, Francis Ford Coppola”, And today we have “Paul Thomas Anderson”,
“Alfonso Cuarón”, “Bong Joon Ho”.
And in the next 100 years some filmmakers will always appear to consider a singular eccentric Out of the ordinary with an
point of view from all over the aldirectoriexceptional and deep world with different cultures who see the art of cinema in their story’s that unite the whole word with the language of visual art on the big screen.
I see cinema after a hundred years affected by current directors with different visions as they themselves were influenced by the great directors before them.
Although there is a great aura of commercial films, but in parallel, there are movies and a group of filmmakers of alternative cinema, That still preserves the old fine cinematic artform, They are a group that cannot be underestimated, One day, after a hundred years, they will be the true pioneers of the industry, I still believe in old movies as a true reference to what the future will be in the film industry, This category of filmmakers will lead the industry to a better place, Filmmaking will be an essential subject in schools and the official educational curriculum, Today, we can make high quality movies by smartphone What will it be like after a hundred years! The camera will be as accessible to everyone as food and water, there will be movie theaters in every country, Countries will adopt a national industry in which the participants will be given creative freedom.
Taras Valihura is a fanatically creative person who balances the creation of a director, screenwriter and actor. In fact, it is one whole, and without another component it is impossible. When creating a script, I think, among other things, whether it will be convenient or interesting for an actor to play this role. In acting (not to the detriment of the result), I also get involved both as a director and as a screenwriter, that is, it contributes to the factor not only of my role, but also how it will look in the general context. And when the director asks to do something that is more than what was planned, I agree and tell the director “I am the director myself, so I want not only my role, but also the entire film to be of high quality.” My first university education is a psychologist. And when there was a master class with a director, who is also a psychologist by first education, I approached him after the meeting and asked “Is it true that psychology also hinders you in directing?” He agreed 🙂 In fact, it passes with time, and if you don’t try to be an author and a psychologist at the same time, you can make a good movie 🙂 Some psychological knowledge in a limited amount can help make the plot or character deeper.
-What inspired you to become a Filmmaker?
Having no education at that time, I was lucky enough to get on the set. And in this case, two options are possible, whether you are not interested in meeting with it again, or this sphere fascinates you and never lets go. I never saw the first version 🙂 I liked it, and I started to get to shootings more often. Over time, I grew up to the lead role in a short film. I was preparing, and on the set I asked the director about the motives for some of my character’s actions, offering several options. The director told me not to overload my head and make it simpler. As a result, that scene did not turn out very well. From the finished material, I edited a video clip for my music group, in which I played at the time. For this, I had to learn how to mount. And then I realized that if I were a director, I would shoot differently. In addition, at that time I was already lucky enough to personally observe how very cool actors work, including well-known Hollywood names – and the virus of the magic of cinema took root in me very deeply.
In fact, I realize that I have been on the road to becoming a director all my life. From the first grades of school, I already tried to write something – first fairy tales, then detective and fantastic stories. In the future, it helped me learn to write scripts more easily. When I became an adult, I started taking pictures. It gave an understanding of lighting, angles, composition. Then he started playing the drums, which made it possible to better understand the music and feel the dynamics of editing.
-Do you think the cinema can bring a change in the society?
Cinema changes society. And in a bad way and in a good way. If someone manipulates an entire nation for tens of years, and imposes the opinion that it is good to be a cannibal, the entire nation becomes cannibals. This is what happened to Russia. Almost every film contained a grain of chauvinism, hatred of Ukrainians and Western countries. And when Russia once again started a war of occupation against Ukraine (which it has done from time to time for 400 years) – most Russians began to rejoice in the killing of civilians, rape, torture and looting. Wives in their correspondence encourage men to commit rape and looting, and soldiers proudly post videos of torture of prisoners of war, civilians, and rape of minor children in front of their fathers, or mothers in front of minor children, on the Internet. And such a result is also thanks to the cinema.
And in a good sense – if a person regularly watches high-quality, spiritually deep films with eternal values, then such values can greatly affect his worldview. An honest film is, in a good sense, a fairy tale that fascinates the viewer, attracts or repels with the atmosphere, creates for the viewer a desire to imitate the main characters, with the help of the plot and emotions – to subconsciously positively perceive the idea of the film.
Another question is whether future generations will watch movies. Already now cats or some obscenities in Tik-Tok collect more views than classic movies. Like in the my film – the amount of time plays a significant role in forming the beliefs of a mature personality. This is the time for reading books, talking about real values with parents, teachers and mentors. And to watch movies. On average, a full-length film is an hour and a half, and a Tik Tok video is several minutes.
It is easier to quickly find a couple of minutes to watch hype videos on social networks, than to allocate several hours (taking into account the way to the cinema) to perceive, for example, a serious drama. And it is better if it will be a cinema itself, because on the Internet the film can be paused, on television the film is interrupted by advertisements, and only in the cinema does the director’s idea move as the director intended, because this is how the film has the most effective effect on the viewer and conveys its main message message.
-What would you change in the world?
At a time when a brutal war is going on in my country and the enemy sets itself the task of committing genocide – I begin to look at the world differently. I understand that security at all levels is a naive illusion. That one sick person can endanger the lives of almost eight billion people, and no one, no world security organization, no country, but ourselves can stop it. It’s like leaving a rape victim to deal with her armed rapist on her own, given that she has to act only within the law.
At such moments comes the understanding that religion can be a tool of enemy special services to promote genocide. Сomes the Understanding that values can be speculated on, and their effect can be changed to the opposite. So I would like to see less hypocrisy, lies, corruption, and bureaucracy in the world. So that rights and obligations are not only on paper. So that people learn to love themselves and respect others. For the law to work, and justice to be its highest value. So that parents love their children and spend enough time with them, because most problems are caused by a lack of love and respect. For people to be responsible for their actions.
But wise people say – if you want to change the world – start with yourself. I once formulated for myself a formula of thinking that creates corruption and other evils: “In general, it is forbidden, but I can do it a little.” Therefore, it will be much more effective when not the environment and the law will try to change or punish a person, but the person himself will be a fair judge for himself. And for this, she needs to be properly educated. It is precisely this function that art, including cinema, should perform to a certain extent. I try to live according to the principle – act honestly (justly, according to the law, humanely), and demand it from others.
-Where do you see the film industry going in the next 100 years?
From time to time I teach some educational subjects in the field of film. And I have my own author’s course on revolutions in cinema. So, one of the latest revolutionary events in film production is the emergence of streaming platforms such as Netflix, HBO, Amazon. The main value of these platforms for cinematography is that they have the opportunity to create their own product, and to focus primarily not on profit, but on making the material itself interesting. Therefore, there is no need to make compromises between profitability and a winning dramatic decision. In the past, mainstream cinema in most cases chose the side of profitability, and as a result, not only the plot line, but also the idea of the work could lose. Interesting ideas that did not promise extra profits usually could not find financing, and were not filmed. But we know exceptional examples in history, when films in the financial sense turned out to be unprofitable, but at the same time became world classics.
In addition, cinema, which emphasizes profitability, is usually more stereotypical and does not allow experiments. So I believe that thanks to streaming platforms, cinema will develop precisely in the direction of a more interesting plot, winning drama, and bold directorial decisions.
I was born and raised in Russia at an unusual time, the 90’s, when the Soviet Union stopped existing and new life started pouring in from the West. For me, this new life brought tons of VHS tapes of Hollywood movies that my dad copied from his friends’ cassettes. We had all the Disney classics – The Little Mermaid, Lion King, Rescuers Down Under, etc. Together with my parents, I watched Trading Places, Die Hard, The Long Kiss Goodnight, Ghost, The Shawshank Redemption… just to name a few. I remember asking my dad to pause the films and explain things I didn’t understand. It was fascinating. We lived in a gray industrial post-soviet city and I was an only child with no friends in my neighborhood. I often felt unbearably bored but when Universal, Paramount, 21st Century Fox, or Disney logo animation started playing my heart would beat fast. I wanted my life to be like a movie. Or at least I wanted to live my life creating movies. At the age of 14, I wrote to ten American film schools and then corresponded with each school by collecting and translating the necessary paperwork. After 1.5 years I got accepted to California College of Arts and Crafts in San Francisco for a 4-year filmmaking program. It happened that my family was not able to pay the tuition. So I didn’t go to America at that time.
Fortunately, I had a plan “B”. As much as I loved movies I loved books. Because they ultimately did the same thing – transferred you to different worlds where you’d rather be. I wrote prose and poems and after finishing high school I went to Moscow to study creative writing. My alma mater was a completely different dimension from what I was initially aiming for. It was a Raskolnikov-Rasputin’s dark mine with diamonds of wisdom. I spent 5 years living together with other writers, poets, and dramaturgists in a miserable old dorm, digging out our intangible treasures. I ran from the ordinary and that was just it.
Over time some of my stories got published. One of them was published in Russian refugees’ magazine “Word” in New York, in 2012. I edited for a living. I worked in television in Moscow for 9 years as an editor, cutting tv-series, documentaries, and talk shows. I learned the craft of editing to make money and also because I saw it as a gateway to directing. And it did lead me there indeed. Now I can create my films using this extensive experience as an editor. And a writer. I combine these two professions in my art.
America showed me that the colorful thrilling world from my VHS tapes exists and I can actually live in it. Nevertheless, I miss my Dostoevsky-Tolstoy Russian world with its deep soul diving and endless roaming through dark depths. I am eager to see these two worlds co-existing in my art, interpenetrating and affecting each other. I’m happy to be in the beginning of this creative way, like a child who is allowed to mix all the colors in a new paint set.
–What inspired you to become a filmmaker?
When I was a child, I visited my grandma at her countryside house. There was only one tv-set on the street, at aunt Madyna’s house. And every evening, about 5-6 grandmas gathered around this old TV and watched soap operas. The other neighborhood kids and I watched too. I was about 11 years old and could already distinguish a bad movie from a good one. I knew they watched really primitive stuff but I saw how happy they all were. Even I waited for these evenings during the day because one tends to feel lonesome away from home. I didn’t feel lonely among these grannies watching TV shows. And then I understood what television and movies are for.
Even the simplest and the cheapest ones. They prevent you from experiencing desperation and loneliness, they give you joy when you don’t have other ways to get it. When my grandma got her own TV, after a long day of physical work she happily ran to watch the next episode of a series. I thought that if my life was going to be as hard as hers, at least I would always have movies to watch.
I thought deeply about it. There are so many people in the world whose lives are hard and lack any exciting events. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, that’s just how it is in villages and in small towns. I know this because I grew up among such people, and my own early life also wasn’t full of adventures. So I know how much a good or even a bad movie means to those in small towns. So why not make movies for them? I decided that I wanted to be a director when I was 12.
-Do you think cinema can bring a change in society?
Cinema is the reflection of society and it certainly can be used by people as a tool to see themselves better, to correct themselves. To spread the word and the way of thinking. And with that, to speed up some changes in society. But I personally always loved the other side of cinema. When it is not a mirror but a lab where you can create something that didn’t exist before. An absolutely new form of existence. Like Jarmusch’s films or some of Antonioni’s films, or some random art house films you can stumble upon in a small movie theater. These are films you simply want to live in. Even if they’re about nothing, you just watch them, breathe them and want to stay in them every day thereafter. I always wanted to create such films. Do they change society? It’s hard to say. But they create joy, fulfillment, fantasies, and peace of mind.
It’s funny, but my first film project “Not For You” was the exact opposite of this kind of movie. I never thought I would start my director’s journey with a film or, in this case, a music video, that has such a message in it. I always agitated for “art for art’s sake”, for creating beautiful cozy worlds where the viewers could rest, enjoy themselves, or experience some insights, desires, and intentions. I didn’t understand showing the dark, cruel side of life in films. There is enough of it in the world, why should we magnify it in art? Whom will it help? And then, when my home country started this war, I found myself planning these anti-war film projects that didn’t align with my artistic credo at all. That’s probably how it works: something horrible happens near you and you just react. You go and film a bloody movie. I intend to return to my initial path but first I will finish another project related to war.
–What would you change in the world?
I’d really want poverty and orphanhood to be eliminated by some genius scientific discovery the way that some fatal illnesses have been eliminated by vaccinations. There should be a way. Some socio-economic study. Then violence could be, if not eliminated, significantly reduced. That’s a dream. But what I could do for the world on my own is to make one’s life a bit fuller and brighter by providing them with meaningful content to watch. I would do my best to create films that could bring people hope and inspiration, or just be a journey to places they didn’t know existed.
–Where do you see the film industry going in the next 100 years?
It’s probably going to microchip implants in our brains. At least engineers say so. The way we watch films will probably change. And the mastery of filmmakers. Compare the tv series of the end of the 20th century and the modern Netflix series. We’ve come a long way after Mexican “Simply Maria” and American “Santa Barbara”. Every episode is approached as a high-quality and well-built and treated feature movie. And it’s just in a 30-year period. What will we achieve in a century?
As I begin to write this piece the brave women and men of Iran are amidst the largest and most unique feminist driven revolution in history.
On September 16th, 2022 a 22 year old Iranian-Kurdish woman named “Zhina Amini” whose legal name was “Mahsa Amini”, died in a hospital in Tehran under unknown circumstances after being detained by the “morality police” for wearing an improper hijab in accordance with the government mandatory hijab standards.
She was at a morality holding station before she collapsed from a heart attack and was transferred to a hospital where she died from a cerebral hemorrhage or stroke.
Footage of Mahsa in this station shows a brief encounter with a woman criticizing her attire moments before she collapses.
Many eye witnesses detained with her claimed she was beaten (These claims were denied by the morality police), an autopsy shown denies these allegations but the public outrage is directly related to how common and unreasonable her being detained was to begin with.
Mahsa was visiting her family in Tehran and came from a small town of “Saqqez” in the province of Kurdistan. She was in a mall with her family and her brother was alongside her as she pleaded with the morality police that she was a stranger there, before being forced to get in a van that transports women wearing improper hijabs to the station.
What sparked the public outrage was bigger than the mere was she beaten or not?
Seeing the footage and looking at her attire nothing seems out of place or a reason for concern.
In the Iranian culture your brother, father and uncles and cousins are far more of a morality police than any government implemented agency can be.
That no government should have the right to have access to people’s children, wives or sisters and determine what they should or should not wear.
Her death sparked the biggest public outrage since the 2009 protests where Neda Agha-Soltan, a student of philosophy, was participating in the protests with her music teacher, and was walking back to her car when she was fatally shot in the upper chest – She was 26 years old and would have been 39 years old today.
The outrage regarding Mahsa Amini instigated protests all over Iran and specifically, in the city of “Sanandaj”, capital of the province of kurdistan. The kurdish minority have experienced many hardships and the protests have been especially intense in the northwest, where many of Iran’s over 10 million Kurds live and where Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have a track record of putting down unrest. There are reported strikes in the Kurdish regions that include Amini’s hometown of Saqqez and Bukan, sharing videos which appeared to show shops with their shutters down in both towns.
The protests spread across the country, including universities & high schools, the words “Women, Life, Freedom” are chanted with fists up in the air. Where women and men walk alongside in cities and on streets chanting death to the current leader “Ali Khamenei” & various anti “islamic republic” sentiments are written on walls and shouted from rooftops of homes.
Athletes, artists, journalists, lawyers and private citizens have since spoken up and stood alongside people protesting against the regime. Many of which were detained and put in the Evin prison where 8 people died recently and as many as 61 injured only a few days ago. Many protestors, all unarmed, such as Nika Shahkarami 17, Sarina Esmailzadeh 16, Hadis Najafi 23 , and many more brave men and women were killed & brutally shot and hit with batons. The death toll is an estimated 233, of which 23 are children so far and increasing in numbers daily.
What is unique about this revolution is that it is fronted and lead by WOMEN. Unveiling of the hijab across the country and in schools and in media is a stance against 43 years of tyranny in the name of Islam forced by a theocratic regime that is not truly Muslim.
Of all muslim countries Iran is actually the only one where a hijab is mandatory & enforced legally. Ironically the first words in the Quran translated are: “In the name of God, the most forgiving & kind”. The Iranian regime is neither of those and has proven itself otherwise and a terrible representation of a true muslim.
Iran also houses many minorities and people of other religions such as Assyrians, jews & Arminian’s among other tribes whom are as Iranian and have a right to practice and live freely without the imposition of the islamic doctrine.
This female lead revolution has been in the making for over 150 years where the first journal of women “Danesh” marked the beginning & the end of feminism activity in Iran from 1910-1933 until its dissolution by the government of Pahlavi I.
A country where renowned and well respected educated poets such as “Parvin Etesami” who studied at the Iran Bethel School in Tehran, (An American high school for girls) graduated in 1924 & taught there for a while. After graduation she wrote the poem A twig of a wish (1924 ) about the struggles facing Iranian women, their lack of opportunities and need for education.
She was a member of Kanoun-e-Banovan & supported Kashf-e-hijab reform against compulsory hijab (veiling). In1936 she was awarded the third degree medal of art & culture by Reza Shah Pahlavi but she declined.
It was the arrival of Pahlavi II in 1941 – 1950’s where women’s rights organizations began to openly advocate for equal political & personal rights. Despite the opposition by clerics, in 1963 a national referendum reflected general support for a 6 point reform program known as the white revolution which included women’s right to vote & stand for public office. Six women were elected in the parliament.
One can not forget when speaking of a woman’s plight, important figures such as contemporary1960’s poet Forough Farrokhzad whose personal life and work reflected a milestone in the feminist movement in Iran. Both Forough & Parvin were divorced and independent though aware of their position as second class citizens in their country.
With Ayatollah Khomeini’s 1979 revolution the process of advancing the rights of women was interrupted. The legal age of marriage was restored to nine years old and women were barred from serving as judges, refused to initiate divorce proceedings and prohibited from serving the army and participating in sports and the use of veil was imposed.
Several decades have passed since Iranian women started to vote and yet today’s events suggest that the Iranian regime has forced women backwards. Since the 1979 revolution women have struggled to regain their lost rights and win a larger role in society. They fare modestly in politics and sports & as an example a popular sport such as soccer is prohibited to be attended by women and for women to attend sports arenas.
In 2019 A young Iranian woman set herself on fire to protest what she was told could be up to six months of jail time for watching a men’s soccer game. She attempted to disguise herself in men’s clothing, but was discovered, arrested and charged with violating modesty laws. The 29 year old named only as Sahar suffered from burns in 90 percent of her body.
This comes as a true setback as women’s football began in Iran in 1970 & the first spark was when they played in local street teams in various cities as goalkeepers and other positions at times.
The story of women’s football is hardly spoken of & its history is ignored. The first soccer team was established by Taj Club, also known as Esteghlal. Talented women were trained and in 1971 Taj recorded the first official win scoring six goals. Between 1969 – 1972 other teams namely Perspolis, pass & eagle were formed. An important fact is that at the time, Alan Rogers was the head coach for the women’s and men’s team.
The first international game was a friendly match on Sep 8th 1971, between Taj & a team of selected women football players from Italy ended in Taj losing 0-2. The Italian women’s national team played the Iranian women’s team following and won 4-0.
The excitement of football throughout the 70s wasn’t limited to Tehran. The focus wasn’t on gender. Women and men worked side by side to plant rice in the fields and went out in back streets to play soccer together.
The back bone of the feminist movement are the brave men and women that support and are marching together for a better society. To lessen a heavy load of poverty and a terrible economy that has burdened a tired nation and brought about too many afflictions to mention.
The history of soccer and the example of the poets mentioned, is fundamentally about a bigger picture where people’s basic human rights are taken away and violated on a much bigger scale daily. That it is the right of anyone to choose what to wear and how to live.
On her tombstone alongside her actual name “Zhina”, a name her family chose for her at birth and was not allowed to legally bind as it didn’t fit with the Islamic standards, are the words “You will not die, your name will be a symbol.”
And a symbol it has become.
I leave you with this poem from Forough Farrokhzad written years ago for the brave fierce women and men of Iran:
“Call to Arms”
Only you, O Iranian woman, have remained In bonds of wretchedness, misfortune, and cruelty; If you want these bonds broken, grasp the skirt of obstinacy
Do not relent because of pleasing promises, never submit to tyranny; become a flood of anger, hate and pain, excise the heavy stone of cruelty.
It is your warm embracing bosom that nurtures proud and pompous man; it is your joyous smile that bestows on his heart warmth and vigour.
For that person who is your creation, to enjoy preference and superiority is shameful; woman, take action because a world awaits and is in tune with you.
Sleeping in a dark grave is happier for you than this abject servitude and misfortune; where is that proud man..? Tell him to bow his head henceforth at your threshold.
Where it that proud mane? Tell him to get up because a woman is here rising to battle him; her words are the truth, in which cause she will never shed tears out of weakness.
